Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: American Astronautical Society, Bigelow space stations, commercial space development, cosmic rays, Data Purchase Act, heavy lift, human spaceflight, ISS, Jim Plaxco, market drive space activity, NanoRacks, NASA, private sector space development, SLS, space industry regulations, space science platforms
Jim Plaxco, Monday, 7-14-15
Your Amazon Purchases Helps Support TSS/OGLF (see www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)
If you rate shows on live365.com, email me your rating reasons to help improve the show
Guest: Jim Plaxco. Topics: The ASS ISS science platform, R&D, commercial space, SLS & more. Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See http://www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm. For those listening to archives using live365.com and rating the programs, please email me as to why you assign a specific rating to the show. This will help me bring better programming to the audience.
We welcomed Jim Plaxco to the program. During the first segment of our 96 minute discussion, Jim initially talked about the recent American Astronautical Society (ASS) conference which had a focus on ISS research. Jim provided us with a quality discussion about science in space and aboard the ISS. We addressed many important issues including ISS crew limitations, the probable life expectancy of the ISS, the type of science done on station, & payload size limitations, including returning to Earth. We talked about private sector experiments, especially those with NanoRacks.
In the same segment, we talked about suborbital science missions which seem to be just around the corner. Jim sees much that is positive coming from these suborbital science missions. Suborbital space tourism was also a topic in this segment. So was the possibility of Bigelow space stations. As the segment ended, we honed in on the need to lower the cost of space access. In our second segment, we started off with SLS as our topic. Jim said he was pro space and cautious at best regarding SLS. We talked about markets for space projects and both of us suggested an absence of markets for SLS though Jim did reference the Data Purchase Act. Bigelow Aerospace habs came up for more discussion. Doug called in and discussed the idea of a separate NASA for science and HSF. Jim had much to say about this concept. Near the end of the program, I asked Jim where he thought HSF would be in five years. We also talked about the suborbitals going orbital (if possible). Jim suggested the industry faced three challenges including financing, the economy, and the regulatory risks. Note that technical challenges were not among his top challenges. Our final topic addressed international partnership for both public and private space ventures.
Please post your comments/questions on TSS blog. You can reach Jim Plaxco through me.
Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: "Outer Space Development, benefit sharing, capitalism, citizen science, commercial space development, Common Heritage of Mankind, creating an ideological shift, Dr. Edythe (Edy) Weeks, environmental issues, giggle factor, IAF, International Institute of Space Law, international relations, International Relations and Space Law: A Method for Elucidating Seeds, NewSpace, nonprofit, private investment, public/private partnerships, revenue sharing, space entrepreneurism, space law, space mining, space property rights. The Outer Space Treaty, space resources, space tourism, tattoos, taxes, The Moon Treaty, United Nations, venture capital
Dr. Edythe Weeks, Tuesday, 11-20-12
Guest: Dr Edythe (Edy) Weeks. Topics: We discussed her book, various commercial space development models, benefit sharing & more. Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com
. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. We welcomed Dr. Edythe (Edy) Weeks to the program to discuss her book, “Outer Space Development, International Relations and Space Law: A Method for Elucidating Seeds.” You can buy her book on Amazon & if you use the following URL, Amazon will contribute to The Space Show/OGLF: www.amazon.com/Outer-Space-Development-International-Relations/dp/1443839655/ref=onegiantlea20
. During our first segment of this 2.5 hour discussion, Dr. Weeks introduced us to her book and the need to understand space development from an international relations perspective. We talked about how the industry has evolved over the last 20+ years, innovations such as citizen science suborbital missions, new commercial players, & innovative business ideas such as asteroid mining. Dr. Weeks talked extensively about the need for an ideological shift toward space throughout the non-space population & within our global educational systems. When Todd from San Diego emailed Edy as to how to create the ideological shift, that opened a discussion on how such shifts are created. It was very interesting that one of the major examples cited by our guest included the growth & popularity of tattoos. This sparked quite a conversation, some of it laced with humor, lots of fun, but also relevant points to our discussion. As our segment was ending, our guest talked about the need to include other perspectives in the space benefits, those coming from outside the STEM fields.
In our second & very long segment, I opened up asking Edy about the ideas in her book in support of benefit sharing & the Common Heritage of Mankind concepts found in some of the U.N. space treaties. This discussion prevailed for the balance of our program as our guest is looking for new and different business & social models for space to be more inclusive which she believes will lead to more space commerce. I took a challenging & argumentative position throughout most of the discussion in explaining why most in the NewSpace and commercial space industries do not support benefit sharing and why. We talked about the need for property rights & why such rights would facilitate commercial development. Dr. Weeks was not supportive of the property rights positions, looking more for space development to accomplish much needed social change and reform around the world. Also, she made the case that property rights were not needed nor supported by the treaties & their working papers. Dr. Weeks did clarify her position regarding capitalism, the U.S., commercial space companies & benefit sharing ideas so don’t miss her clarification. Let us know your thoughts on our blog. Tax revenues were discussed but as you will hear, our guest focuses on actual benefit sharing beyond tax payments to help create wealth for everyone, including those that would be the recipient of the benefit sharing programs & the commercial space business. We talked about voluntary charitable giving as compared to mandatory or government required giving through benefit sharing. I cited Microsoft & Google models for why private sector giving with the pursuit of business unfettered by government induced benefit sharing is better. Tim called in to express his very strong views in support of the private sector & his opposition to reallocation of resources regardless of how it is termed by either government or the UN. Edy referenced the OST & the Moon Treaty in making her points, making the case that outer space resources belong to everyone, not just the developer. While we did use an outrageously successful multi-trillion dollar model for our discussion of the space mining example, the idea was made that the company could easily afford to “give” a percentage to the benefit sharing process, over & above taxes, assuming the company was profitable, even at more realistic levels. Our guest was very articulate in presenting her views & ideas, plus her book does a very good job of comprehensively dealing with what we just barely had time to scratch during our program. For more information, check out Edy’s blog and YouTube video: www.youtube.com/watch?v=okyVWJglxow & http://blogs.webster.edu/globalthinking/blog/2012/07/16/outer-space-development-is-subject-of-new-book-by-hpirs-edythe-weeks/#more-2802
Please post all comments/questions about this discussion on The Space Show blog. I will bring all comments to the attention of Dr. Weeks on a regular basis.