jump to navigation

Special Monday Open Lines, Monday, 3-3-14 March 4, 2014

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
5 comments

Special Monday Open Lines, Monday, 3-3-14

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/s

Your Amazon Purchases Can Help Support The Space Show/OGLF (www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

If you are listening to archives & rating programs on live365.com,  email me the reasons for your rating to help improve the show.

Guest:  Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston.  Topics:  Business plans, due diligence, Mars One, skepticism, cynicism, SpaceX & more.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.  For those listening to archives using live365.com and rating the programs, please email me as to why you assign a specific rating to the show. This will help me bring better programming to the audience.

Our scheduled guest for this program, Dr. Jeff Bell, was a no-show.  At the request of several listeners, rather than canceling the  program, I let it run as a special Open Lines show.  There were no breaks in the discussion.  Our first caller in this 1 hour 53 minute discussion was Dwayne who inquired about my frequent comments on the need for a business plan and due diligence in evaluating potential space businesses.  I offered to send interested listeners a copy of the business plan outline I work from if they email and request it.  We went through the business plan outline I use, then we talked about due diligence for all aspects of the venture including management, financial, marketing, technology, engineering, and more.  Dwayne wanted to know about possible market saturation for the low barrier to entry cubesats and Earth imaging satellites now entering the market place.  Doug was the next caller.  He had wanted to talk with Dr. Bell about an older paper of his showing skepticism for the COTS program which Doug believes to be successful.  The discussion with Doug was too long so callers, you need to be succinct, consolidate your comments and questions, and don’t expect unlimited time for your call.  As they say, “this was my bad” to have let the call go on for so long and I apologize to those of you who got tired of waiting to call the show and just logged out.  The discussion with Doug included how to assess the likely success of a business venture, management, and more.  We used both Mars One and SpaceX as examples.  Charles then called to talk about his book Microlaunchers and The Space Review’s book review of it by Dr. Jeff Foust. You can read the review at www.thespacereview.com/article/2461/1.  Our last caller was Tony who challenged the electric car comments made by Charles and me.  Tony wanted to advocate for green technology, solar, etc.  I apologize for how I talked to and handled Tony’s call.  Because I did not agree with him was no excuse for my being rude and I will do my best to not let that happen again.  Tony and I disagree on these issues which is fine by my book.  Most of the time listeners don’t know my own thoughts on lots of the topics discussed on TSS so you have no clue if I concur or not with what is being said, but I did engage Tony & I should have been more respectful with him.  I understand the validity of the points he was making though I dispute that any of that is reality at this time in the U.S.  We ended this special program by pointing out that our regular March OL show is Tuesday, March 4.  I will make an announcement when I can reschedule Dr. Bell.

Please post your comments/questions on TSS blog above. If you want to reach any of our callers or emailiers, you can do so through me.

 

Charles Pooley & Ed LeBouthillier, Monday, 1-13-14 January 14, 2014

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Charles Pooley & Ed LeBouthillier, Monday, 1-13-14

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2164-BWB-2014-01-13.mp3

Your Amazon Purchases Can Help Support The Space Show/OGLF (www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

Guests:  Charles Pooley &Ed LeBouthillier.  Topics:  The Microlauncher concept and new book just published.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.

We welcomed Charles Pooley back to the show along with his co-author Ed LeBouthillier to discuss the first Microlaunchers book,  “Microlaunchers: Technology for a New Space Age.”  For more information, visit www.microlaunchers.com. Remember, if you order the book through Amazon, please do so through the OGLF Amazon portal which is listed on TSS website, TSS blog, and in all archive summary statements.  If you have questions about this, email me.  It is important for TSS to receive these contributions from Amazon.  During the first segment of our 1 hour 33 minute program, Charles and Ed talked with us about the Microlaunchers concept and how that concept is depicted in the book.  We also learned how Charles and Ed met and the role each had in writing and completing this book.  Our first caller Jeff from Tucson won the give away copy of the book.  Jeff also asked our guests about the role of cubesats in the Microlaunchers concept specifically for LEO and then GEO.  This led to Charles talking with us about secondary payloads and why he does not favor them.  Charles & Ed then described some of the Microlaunchers launch parameters, then we took a question from Paul in Boston who wanted to ask about market concerns for the Microlauncher concept.  Doug from S. California was the next caller with three specific issues to raise with our two guests.  We also talked about payload mass and the path to a larger system, including the GEO market.  As the segment ended, Charles put forth his payload pricing goals for his system.

In the second segment, we started out with Ed describing the organization of the book into three main sections. Next, our guests fielded questions about propulsion.  Charles said they were using a bi-propellant fuel consisting of liquid propane and liquid oxygen.  Hardware issues were also discussed and our guests raised issues of how to get more awareness and visibility for their concept.  The last call came from Nels in London as we were about to end the show.  Nels wanted to know about the trades considered and used regarding the fuels and the propulsion systems our guests talked about during the program.  Both our guests left us with closing comments you will want to hear.

Please post your comments/questions on TSS blog.  You can reach our guests through the Microlaunchers website or through me. Learn more about Ed at http://home.earthlink.net/~apendragn/atg.

Open Lines, Tuesday, 10-8-13 October 9, 2013

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
3 comments

Open Lines, Tuesday, 10-8-13

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2102-BWB-2013-10-08.mp3

Your Amazon Purchases
Can Help Support The Space Show/OGLF (www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

Guest:  Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston.  Topics:  The movie Gravity, NASA budget issues, ISS, Commercial Crew, SLS missions, Orbital, SpaceX and more.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.

Welcome to our two hour Open Lines discussion program.  For the first hour, our discussion topics included the movie Gravity and its special effects plus as said by many calling and emailing on the topic, “really bad orbital dynamics!”  We had fun talking about Gravity, the cast, the story line, and how Hollywood often gets the science and engineering wrong.  John Hunt also talked about SLS and basic physics, the gravitational constant theory, quantum vacuum thrusters, and he responded to Doug’s question about light, mass, and momentum.  John also addressed issues with the quantum theory.  Dr. Lurio of the Lurio Report was next to phone in after “SLS Man” as he referred to John, cleared the line.  As frequent listeners know, Dr. Lurio and John are on opposite sides of the SLS issue which I guess earned John the title SLS Man.  Charles, perhaps you will write about SLS Man in the Lurio Report?  Charles talked about the recent successes with Orbital and Space X and the attempted return of the Falcon fist stage in the reusability test.  Charles talked about the developing nanosat business and the opening up of commercial opportunities on the ISS, all in the context of choices NASA may have to make regarding funding priorities including SLS, ISS, Commercial Crew (see  http://spaceref.com/missions-and-programs/nasa/nasa-will-face-solomons-choice-in-2014.html.

In our second segment,  Doug called in to talk about the Mars SLS option (here is the URL for the story:  www.nasaspaceflight.com/2013/10/nasa-con-ops-baseline-slsorion-mission-mars).  Doug then talked about a cislunar transportation system and how it was the key to expanding space development.  The Shackleton Energy lunar development plan came up  as did Bigelow space stations.  Charles Pooley called in from Las Vegas and guess what!!!! His Microlaunchers book is almost finished and ready for distribution!!!!  Now pick yourself off the floor so you can read the rest of the summary and listen to the show but yes, we are all in a daze, a fog and a varying degrees of shock.  I told Charles that when it is out as an ebook and a paperback, he can definitely come back on the show and talk about it.  He said it should be finished by November or so as it is out to 5 people (I am not one of them) to review and edit the manuscript.  All of here at The Space Show wish Charles Godspeed in finishing the book and we hope it meets all of his expectations.  Tim was our last caller.  He thought that if push came to shove, SLS would be shut down before the ISS.  He also suggested a Bigelow station would help enable Shackleton. I gave him and the audience a sort of business perspective on what would be needed in order for a Bigelow station to support and enhance the Shackleton plan.

Please post your comments/questions on The Space Show blog.

Dr. Haym Benaroya, Tuesday, 8-13-13 August 14, 2013

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Dr. Haym Benaroya, Tuesday, 8-13-13

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2068-BWB-2013-08-13.mp3

 Your Amazon Purchases Can Help Support The Space Show/OGLF (www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

Guest:  Dr. Haym Benaroya.  Topics:  Lunar data analysis, Return to the Moon, space policy & more. Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.

We welcomed Dr. Haym Benaroya, mechanical and aerospace engineer at Rutgers University, back to the show to discuss lunar thermal and seismic analysis, space policy, human spaceflight, Mars, and more.  Our intention was to do a one hour program but due to incoming listener phone calls, this program lasted for 1 hour 39 minutes without a break!  In addition, the discussion at times with callers was quite heated, very passionate and ripe with disagreement, especially between callers and myself.  Frankly, there were times I just had enough of the gloom and doom and the la la land fantasy stuff so I blasted back on what the callers more than the guest were saying.  We started the program with an update from Dr. Benaroya on thermal and seismic analysis of lunar data collected from sensors left on the Moon by the Apollo missions.  The data has been run through new models for up to date processing.  As it turns out, for seismic activity, an igloo like structure which Dr. Benaroya described is probably the best for the habitat. Also, he said only flimsy items such as an antenna would like be risky structures due to lunar seismic activity.  I asked him to compare lunar seismic activity to the seismic activity of California and Japan.  We have it much worse here on Earth!  We talked about radiation issues & Haym suggested about 10 feet of regolith on the top of the hab would probably be OK other than for a solar event.  He also said much more data was needed for actual lunar structural engineering.  I asked him what the first lunar settlers would do during their day and this took us to HSF to Mars issues, microgravity concerns, and the Moon as a stepping stone to Mars.  John Hunt was the first of the callers, focusing on policy with the politicians.  Haym talked 3D printing with him, then I asked John if the program he was describing could be done in 10 years.  After forcing him to provide us with a yes no answer, he said no. Haym said the same but both agreed technology was not the problem, leadership was the problem.  We talked the need for profits for private ventures and opened up public/private partnerships for discussion on the show.  I asked both how to start implementing their plans & that was the opening salvo of the fireworks that unfolded for the rest of the show.  Doug called next and talked about his ideas for what astronauts on the Moon would do and his lunar development ideas.  I then challenged both caller and guest to outline their steps for making their happen.  I thought their implementation plans were severely lacking and opened up on each of them but more so on Doug for the balance of his call.  Haym said the first step was to rebuild U.S. launch capabilities. Doug had a different first step & talked about government funding as in a private/public partnership similar to what SpaceX has with NASA for Falcon.  I asked Dough how he intended to sell the importance & value of the program he suggested to those controlling policy and funding.  See what you think of this discussion & post your comments on our blog.  After Doug cleared the line, Charles Pooley called in & at one time I said he was the longest playing broken record in Space Show history! I told him he was full of doom and gloom and other people see things differently and I did not want is view of things to be right or prevail, suggesting others see things differently than he does. Again, your comments are welcome.  Near the end, I simply was rejecting the “dismal situation” facing our space program. While Haym agreed that things were not good today, he talked about how he inspires and works with his students so they can create a positive space environment during their careers and for our future.  Just before the show ended, Tim called at the last minute and I promised to send him a Timex given his rotten sense of timing show after show. With Tim, we talked propulsion, Zubrin’s thoughts on going to the Moon, & the two private Mars missions on the drawing board.  In his concluding remarks, Haym explained why he was not supportive of either Inspiration Mars or Mars One.

Please post your comments/questions on The Space Show blog. Haym can be emailed through me or his Rutgers website.

 

OPEN LINES, Tuesday, 7-30-13 July 31, 2013

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

OPEN LINES, Tuesday, 7-30-13

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2058-BWB-2013-07-30.mp3

Your Amazon Purchases
Can Help Support The Space Show/OGLF (www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

Guest:  Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston.  Topics:  A variety of topics relating to space development & exploration. Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.

Our first segment of this 2 hour 14 minute Open Lines program started with a few of my suggested topics including a recent John Strickland Space Review article on SLS followed by a response from NASA which was published in the Huntsville Times as well as on NASA Watch.  More about this later as a caller read the two articles, then called to discuss them.  However, our first caller was Dr. Jurist who called to mention and congratulate the UND Space Studies Department for the award they received from NASA: The JSC Certificate of Appreciation for 25 years of outstanding leadership in the interdisciplinary leadership of space studies.  During John’s call, I read the exact wording on the certificate and since John and I are both adjunct professors at UND SpSt, we had much to say about the program, faculty, subjects, students, founders, etc.  It’s a fine program and it was an honor to let all of you know about this well deserved award and the UND Masters and PhD program in Space Studies.  Next up was our friend Dr. Bryan Laubscher to discuss this year’s upcoming Space Elevator Conference to be held August 23-25 at the Museum of Flight in Seattle, WA.  See http://www.isec.org/sec for more conference information, registration, the agenda, and logistics.  We talked about new developments with the space elevator, and Bryan told us about two other projects, plus he mentioned launch loop for which you can get more information at www.launchloop.com.  John in Ft. Worth called as he read the two articles on SLS and the NASA response that I mentioned at the first of our program.  His bottom line observation on SLS did not change as he believes it’s a placeholder for both the space workforce and technology until better days favor the space industry.  We had much to say about what John Strickland said in his July 15 TSR article and the NASA response by Dan Dumbacher per his July 29th article.  You don’t want to miss this discussion.

In the second longer segment, Tim was first up to talk about Rand Simberg and his theories that space is not important and more risk is needed, not more risk averseness. Tim made comparisons to settlers coming to the New World and I challenged him on it but his bottom line is that most likely most of the population will not be interested in space or space settlement and eventually when technology advances and prices are significantly lower, private companies will take the lead into space.  This of course only related to human spaceflight.  Our next caller was Mr. Microlaunchers himself, Charles Pooley.  Charles was again making the case for his approach to space through Microlaunchers (www.microlaunchers.com) when Dr. Jurist called in on the guest phone line to challenge Charles, especially about financing, time lines, ROI, etc.  John kept pushing Charles for how he intended to go from A to B.  It was a good discussion with John and Charles, one you will certainly want to hear.  John from Ft. Worth called back to talk about a possible rocket shape modeled on the Aquapod water bottle used by Ozarka Water Company. When I told listeners how to see it on the web, Charles emailed back saying the design would not work for a rocket. Oh well, back to drinking the water from it, I guess.  Our final call was from Jeff in Tucson who talked about his recent tour of Surrey Satellite when he was visiting in the UK.  This is an extensive description with very good and important observations.  Since Jeff has also visited SpaceX, we did some compare and contrast analysis between these two state of the art companies, one in the UK and one here in the states in S. California.  Also, you will want to take note of Jeff’s keen observations regarding Surrey and what makes it tick, including the cost free relationship it has with the Surrey University and its undergraduate as well as graduate students, many of which eventually come to work for Surrey Satellite.  Again, this is a very interesting discussion.

Please post your comments/questions on The Space Show blog.  If you want to email any of the callers, you can do so through drspace@thespaceshow.com.

Open Lines, Tuesday, 2-19-13 February 20, 2013

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
1 comment so far

Open Lines, Tuesday, 2-19-13

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/1953-BWB-2013-02-19.mp3

Guest:  Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston.  Topics: Carnival Cruise lines & informed consent, space radiation, nanosat launchers, & much more.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information.

     We started our one hour fifty-one minute Open Lines discussion by my throwing out some suggested topics which included recent USA Today polls on human spaceflight to Mars and informed consent using the recent Carnival Cruise Line cruise from hell as a possible indicator of what may happen in the space tourism industry.  Dave, our first caller, talked about the new efforts to create NTRs and have nuclear propulsion using tungsten as the fuel base. Dave had lots to say about the tungsten as well as traditional fuels.  I next read a listener email about an NCIS Los Angeles 2011 episode about satellite sale to a foreign party and ITAR,.  Next, we talked about another listener email calling our attention the SpaceWorks Nanosatellite Market Report, and then up next was the CNN interview with Bill Nye and the CNN anchor asking Bill if global warming was causing the NEOs and events like the Russian meteorite.  Thanks to Tim for sending in the URL for the interview which you can see and hear at  www.youtube.com/watch?v=ObU7awpJctQ.

     In our second segment, Pooley called in to support my informed consent and Carnival Cruise Line comments plus he again told us why he did not think the space tourism industry would be successful.  Charles also talked about the Russian meteorite and the need for a dedicated cubesat or nanosat launcher over and above flying small sats as secondary payloads. In addition, we talked about the Google Lunar XPrize and the absence of launch contracts for the ride to the Moon.  Tim called to talk about the nanosat launch industry, we talked about the upcoming Virgin Galactic1 small satellite launchers and deep space radiation and HSF.  The dedicated small sat launcher reminded me of an Oct. 13, 2008 Jurist Space Review article proposing a university consortium for such a launch system and the condemnation he got for his proposal.  Dr. Jurist called in to talk about his proposal and the response.  You can read his 2008 Space Review article here:  www.thespacereview.com/article/1228/1.  I also asked Dr. Jurist about Tim’s radiation comments and he explained this particular radiation issue to us. He also said there was a real lack of valid data points so much of what Tim, John and I were talking about was simply an unknown or extrapolated from data pools that may be quite different from those at the lower end of exposure.  In discussing this subject, Dr. Jurist talked about American radiation standards, astronauts as radiation workers, and the European standards.  At the end of the program, Tim called to talk about the Carnival Cruise Line incident and informed consent. Tim suggested tort reform with caps but also put forth a novel behavioral theory and I told him I would absolutely go on the five day cruise from hell to earn a million dollars!

     Please post your comments/questions on The Space Show blog.  You can email any of the participants in this program through me at drspace@thespaceshow.com.

Open Lines, Tuesday, 1-15-13 January 16, 2013

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
8 comments

Open Lines, Tuesday, 1-15-13

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/1930-BWB-2013-01-15.mp3

Guest:  Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston.  Topics:  This was a wide ranging discussion on many space topics & related issues.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information.  We talked about many topics and issues on this 2 hour 40 minute program.  In the first segment, ITAR reform was discussed and Andrew of the Tea Party In Space in his discussion also advocated for the resumption of manufacturing Plutonium 238. We got caught off but he called back in the second segment.  Charles called to advocate for small markets & an incremental approach.  He continues working on Microlaunchers.  John from Atlanta called to talk about strange lights over Detroit.  We had a good time talking about the mysterious Detroit sightings which you can easily see pictures of & find out more if interested with a very simple Google search.  John also wanted to talk about our recent advanced propulsion program about warp drive and interstellar physics.  If you have not heard that program from Jan. 4, 2013, I strongly recommend you do listen to it.  Space budget, economic and sequestration issues came up in this segment as well. We also talked about the bankruptcy sale of special battery company A123 to China and the fact that this includes sensitive military technology.  Listeners expressed a variety of opinions about this matter.  Perri provided us with this Forbes story on the matter:  www.forbes.com/sites/greatspeculations/2012/12/12/china-wins-u-s-loses-in-a123-bankruptcy.  I also read a PR statement from a group opposing the sale to China.

     In our longer second segment, Andrew called back and we talked about economic issues in congress, SLS, Golden Spike, and building relationships with staffers in congress to better advocate for space.  Tim called from Huntsville to tell us about the absurd PETA, Elon Musk and vegetarian issue arising about the food people will eat on Mars. You can read about it at these locations:  http://rt.com/usa/news/space-mars-musk-people-595 and http://betabeat.com/2013/01/elon-musk-would-like-you-to-know-i-am-not-the-kale-eating-overlord-of-mars.  Based on this story, we got several listener comments on PETA, Martian food, and space nutrition.  In fact Doug called to say that he thought early Mars missions would likely be vegetarian just for mass and technical reasons.  Our last caller was Perri who wanted to talk about the need to refurbish and bring back to life the excellent Colorado teaching planetarium, the Robert H. Johnson Planetarium in Jefferson County.  Perri provided us with lots of good information on this planetarium and its refurbishment needs.  She also talked about food consolidation problems in the U.S. and globally, plus a host of other matters, including the plutonium issue which was mentioned in the first segment.  Here, she told us about the Rocky Flats Cold War Museum based on The Rocky Flats Nuclear Plant.  The museum is also in Jefferson County, CO. For more information, visit www.rockyflatscoldwarmuseum.org.  If you want to connect with Perri about the planetarium or any of the other issues she mentioned, you can email her through me.

     You can also email all our callers through me at drspace@thespaceshow.com.  Please post your comments/questions on The Space Show blog.

Jeff Krukin, Monday, 2-6-12 February 7, 2012

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Jeff Krukin, Monday, 2-6-12

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/1706-BWB-2012-02-06.mp3

Guest:  Jeff Krukin.  Topics:  Space Vision & Space Policy.  You are invited to comment, ask questions, & discuss the Space Show program/guest(s) on the Space Show blog, http://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments, questions, & any discussion must be relevant & applicable to Space Show programming. Transcripts of Space Show programs are not permitted without prior written consent from The Space Show (even if for personal use) & are a violation of the Space Show copyright.  We welcomed Jeff Krukin back to the program to discuss how we do & should view space.  For more information about Jeff & his space work, please visit www.jeffkrukin.com.  Our discussion started with an evaluation of where we are today with space policy & the toxic nature of politics, including space politics.  Jeff cited some examples of what he meant by toxic political rhetoric.  As we began looking forward, Jeff put forth three perspectives as to the character of space. These three perspectives, if kept in mind, go beyond just thinking of space as a federal program. (1) Space is a mere 62 miles above us, & thus a continuation of our environment; (2) Space can be an extension of the economy , & thus part of our lives; (3) Space is a place of abundant resources, & thus crucial to our survival & prosperity.  You can read his Space Daily article on this subject at www.spacedaily.com/news/oped-04t.html.  I asked Jeff how to realize his three goals & we talked about the media in this country as well as advocacy, especially with politicians.  The suggestion was made to start with local & regional politicians, evolving upwards to politicians on the larger & grander national scale.  Several callers were with us during the first segment suggesting we go from think tank up the ladder to the national representatives. One of our callers suggested a new concept, venture philanthropy.  This proved to be an interesting discussion given the way the existing billionaire space entrepreneurs were characterized in terms of their investment, activity, & as potential role models for others to invest from a philanthropic perspective, not just a business case perspective.  Jeff then talked about the New Space Conference Business Plan Competition for 2012.  If you are interested in it &  possibly competing, visit http://newspacebpc.com. Before the segment ended, an email came in suggesting a Microlaunchers type policy followed by Charles calling us. Don’t miss the Pooley/Microlaunchers discussion.  

In our second segment, Jeff talked about the need for a space transportation infrastructure.  I then asked him how one goes about implementing the policies & ideas we had been discussing for the past hour or so.  The subject of SLS came up & as to be expected, it drove the passions on all sides.  Tim used an ice analogy that Jeff seemed to like. I took the part of a contrarian (I did this often during this interview) regarding the difficult choices for members of Congress in voting against jobs in their district given the economic realties of today. This came up in the first segment too in response to a listener question.  I suggested it might be unrealistic to think congress would vote against jobs in the context of today’s economy as compared to when the U.S. economy was or again becomes strong/robust.  I challenged the NewSpace thinking on what policy was & might be in the best interest of the country as it might not be the NewSpace ideas.  Jeff handled the questions & opinions I threw at him very well & in my opinion, he demonstrated not only civility, but reason, common sense, drive, & open mindedness.  Near the end we talked about some of the ideas Dennis Wingo put forth on his most program, then Jeff left us with a thoughtful set of closing comments. 

 If you have comments/questions for Jeff Krukin, please post them on The Space Show blog URL above.  If you want to contact Jeff, you can do so through me at drspace@thespaceshow.com.

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.

Join 69 other followers