jump to navigation

Open Lines, Sunday, 5-31-15 June 1, 2015

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
12 comments

Open Lines, Sunday, 5-31-15

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2483-BWB-2015-05-31.mp3

Your Amazon Purchases Helps Support TSS/OGLF (see www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

If you rate shows on live365.com, email me your rating reasons to help improve the show

Guest: Open Lines. Topics: Space Show website & crowdfunding, space industry news, issues, & events covering timely topics. Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, https://thespaceshow.wordpress.com. Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm. For those listening to archives using live365.com and rating the programs, please email me as to why you assign a specific rating to the show. This will help me bring better programming to the audience.

Welcome to our final Open Lines program for May 2015. During the first segment of our 1 hour 46 minute program, I threw out some suggested topics for discussion including Space Show website changes, our planned crowd funding project for financing the new website, a satirical article in The Onion, “NASA Announces Bold Plan To Still Exist By 2045” (see www.theonion.com/article/nasa-announces-bold-plan-still-exist-2045-50398), and the possibility of the government regulating lunar and asteroid mining plus other topics as well. Tim from Huntsville was our first caller. He misunderstood my comment about The Onion article and wanted to know what bold plan NASA was announcing for 2045. I clarified the matter with him but he still seemed to think the article had more to do with the reality of NASA today rather than just a comedy article in The Onion. I disagreed with him but he did say that space policy based on a two term administration and then changing was not productive and should be changed. Later in my conversation with Tim I mentioned an LA Times article by Jerry Hirsch which was highly critical of Elon Must for taking government subsidies. Little did I know that this article would be the hot topic of the day on this Open Lines program. The actual article, “Elon Musk’s growing empire is fueled by $4.9 billion in government subsidies” can be read at www.latimes.com/business/la-fi-hy-musk-subsidies-20150531-story.html#page=1. As I sated on air with several callers and emailers, I thought the article was incomplete and a hit piece since it ignored the basic economic facts of government non-cash subsidies. Dennis Wingo called in to refute the article though Kelly Starks emailed us in support of the main theme of the article. During John’s call from Florida, I was asked to see if the article’s author would come on The Space Show. I commented that I was probably not that interested in talking to him and noted my experience with general audience journalists (not all of them) as compared to talking with space journalists. In the meantime, Marshall called to chime in on the presidential cycle and space policy and what it means for long term space projects. We did note several projects that have survived through various administrations such as Hubble, many of the planetary science missions, SLS and more.

In the second segment, Tom, a first time caller to the show from Seattle, wanted to talk about his view of the space industry being immature. By immature, he meant that doing only a hundred or fewer launches a year and not that much new being done in space indicated being immature to him. He also supported Rocket Lab, Planet Labs and the emerging cubesat industry. We talked about the need to lower the cost of space access to get more players and ventures in space. Michael Listner called into to talk in detail about the newly passed House commercial space bill. He said it was passed on party lines and would go to the Senate and there would have to be compromises for it to go to the President. He talked about problems areas including company liability for example. He also mentioned the new title for astronauts who will fly on the Dragon and CST 100, Government Astronauts. By giving the crew this title, they will not be designated spaceflight participants, thus their safety can be regulated NASA and the spacecraft will need some sort of certification or something to fly government astronauts on board. This will allow NASA to set crew safety standards. He referenced a Space Review article which you can read here: http://thespacereview.com/article/2759/1. Doug from S. California was our next caller. He introduced us to the term paraterraforming. Doug explained this to us in some detail. He also called it “reversible exploration.” This discussion included noting the ethical issues around any type of terraforming, radiation, energy requirements, and more.

Please post your comments/questions on TSS blog above. Also, please post suggestions or email me regarding crowd funding incentive and video ideas for creating a new Space Show website.

Open Lines, Tuesday, 5-12-15 May 13, 2015

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
add a comment

Open Lines, Tuesday, 5-12-15

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2472-BWB-2015-05-12.mp3

Your Amazon Purchases Helps Support TSS/OGLF (see www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

If you rate shows on live365.com, email me your rating reasons to help improve the show

Guests: Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston; Topics: We remembered Charles Pooley and discussed multiple current space topics of interest.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, https://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.  For those listening to archives using live365.com and rating the programs, please email me as to why you assign a specific rating to the show. This will help me bring better programming to the audience.

 

Welcome to our first May 2016 Open Lines program.  During the first segment of our very long 2 hour 26 minute program, I suggested 13 topics for discussion.  While we did manage to discuss most of them, the most popular included remembering Charles Pooley and talking about the EM drive.  Many listeners called in during both segments to remember Charles Pooley.  Also in the first segment, the EM drive came up for discussion with John in Ft. Worth.  He had much to say about the potential of the EM drive, plus he commented on why many traditional scientists say nothing is there, that any results are only on the margin.  I cited a recent article at www.nasaspaceflight.com/2015/04/evaluating-nasas-futuristic-em-drive.

 

In the second segment, we started off with Steve Nixon talking about Charles but it soon evolved to a discussion about space solar power and the upcoming ISDC conference.  In touting SSP, Steve referenced the work by Keith Henson and others, the SunSat Competition, and more.  I was extremely skeptical of his SSP claims which depended on Skylon working and significantly lowering the cost of space access. That claim made me even more skeptical.  I told him Keith was welcome back on the show to discuss his latest SSP analysis, assumptions, and claims so we will see if Keith wants to return after ISDC which is later this month in Toronto.  I recall earlier comments & analysis by Keith which were certainly in the skeptical range from my perspective.  I do hope he returns as we can have a good discussion with lots of listener participation.  Based on listener emails and some phone comments, I was not the only one skeptical about the latest SSP claims.  BJohn emailed us to say that Pooley’s idead were coming into their time, plus he commented on EM drive.  Dr. Dwayne Day called in and somehow we got to talking about high price art auctions and the Picasso that just sold at Christies for $179 million +.  I also referenced the Christies auction last year of James Bond movie items including the original Moonraker Space Shuttle model which sold for $89,000+.  Dwayne then addressed his reason for calling which was a recent Jeff Foust article reporting on the status of the NTSB investigation and report regarding both the Virgin Galactic and Orbital Antares accidents.  Dwayne’s comments on the investigation were interesting so make sure you hear them.  We talked more on the EM drive, then Tim called to refute SSP as well as terrestrial solar power. He also said the EM drive could be used as a doomsday weapon!  Dr. Doug called and said kind things about Charles, then he wanted to talk about home grown space experiments.  He briefly mentioned one he did regarding eating dried foods.  He will have more to say about this on the next Open Lines show at the end of this month.

 

Please post your comments/questions on TSS blog above.  You can reach any of the participants through me @ drspace@thespaceshow.com.

 

Open Lines, Tuesday, 4-28-15 April 29, 2015

Posted by The Space Show in Uncategorized.
Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , ,
4 comments

Open Lines, Tuesday, 4-28-15

http://archived.thespaceshow.com/shows/2463-BWB-2015-04-28.mp3

Your Amazon Purchases Helps Support TSS/OGLF (see www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm)

If you rate shows on live365.com, email me your rating reasons to help improve the show

Guest:  Open Lines with Dr. David Livingston.  Topics:  Space Show website & possible crowd funding program, a variety of other space topics.  Please direct all comments and questions regarding Space Show programs/guest(s) to the Space Show blog, https://thespaceshow.wordpress.com.  Comments and questions should be relevant to the specific Space Show program. Written Transcripts of Space Show programs are a violation of our copyright and are not permitted without prior written consent, even if for your own use. We do not permit the commercial use of Space Show programs or any part thereof, nor do we permit editing, YouTube clips, or clips placed on other private channels & websites. Space Show programs can be quoted, but the quote must be cited or referenced using the proper citation format. Contact The Space Show for further information. In addition, please remember that your Amazon purchases can help support The Space Show/OGLF. See www.onegiantleapfoundation.org/amazon.htm.  For those listening to archives using live365.com and rating the programs, please email me as to why you assign a specific rating to the show. This will help me bring better programming to the audience.

Welcome to this two hour Open Line discussion on a variety of topics.  Note that while I took two breaks during the discussion, I am still archiving the show in just two segments.  During the first segment, my suggested discussion topics included my response to an April 10 email from Doug wondering why I strongly believe that the economic development of space will be a sizeable part of the future economy.  I answered this question for Doug on air and during the show a few listeners added to my answer.  My next suggested topic dealt with The Space Show website problems and the development of a new site to be funded by a crowd funding program.  I asked listeners for suggestions for incentives to offer contributors to the crowd funding venture. While most offered excellent and serious suggestions, one or two listeners responded with sarcastic comments and probably in their mind, funny comments.  But I am very serious about this.  The Space Show website is moving, we are trying to move the existing site to stay up with something that works and all of you are familiar with as a completely new site needs to be funded.  If you do have suggestions for incentives for supporting our crowd funding effort, post them on the blog or email them to me.  I appreciate this.  Our first caller was Andrew in Tucson who called from the top of Kitt Peak as he was there working two telescopes and doing observatory work.  We talked with Andrew about his work and project, the telescopes, life on Kitt Peak, light pollution in the area and more.  We also talked with him about other observatories in Tucson and Flagstaff, plus since he has been to Mauna Kea in Hawaii, we talked about that as well.  I planned a visit to him on Kitt Peak and will do some recorded interviews while there for future Space Show program.

We took a break at the top of the hour and returned to talk with Jeff from Tucson about his work with Andrew and his thoughts on the ULA-Vulcan project plus comments by the new ULA head, Tory Bruno.  I asked if he had read the recent Space Cynics post on ULA Vulcan by Shubber Ali who pretty much dissed the venture (see https://spacecynic.wordpress.com – the lead post).  Jeff briefly looked at it and said it lacked numbers and fact and was an opinion piece. What Jeff then had to say was based on engineering, numbers, and fact and he thought it was a good project.  Don’t miss what Jeff had to say about ULA Vulcan as it was a good call.  Jeff’s called sparked others to comment on both ULA and SpaceX and I made the case for needing both companies and more to help the emerging commercial space industry grow and develop.  I also commented that the one or the other mentality or moon vs. mars or being forced to make choices at the expense of other valid choices was counter-productive and not supportive of industrial growth yet I realize we are living in tight budget times.  We took another short break, then Tim called in to disagree with an earlier guest on the possible use of RTGs on the Moon and the use of material such as Plutonium 239 or substitute materials that may be cheaper and in more abundant supply.  Mike called to advocate for getting Ms. Shotwell of SpaceX back on the show, then Doug called to question the year long ISS experiment with Scott Kelly.  Rather than using a time line for the mission parameter, he wanted to suggest targeted objectives to meet.  While I thought his idea was a good one, I was at a loss how to suggest he go about getting changes in the mission design for this experiment.  I did suggest I would see if I could find who designed this mission and get them to be on The Space Show. If any of you have specific information on this, please let me know.

Post your comments/questions on TSS blog above.  You can reach any of the participants in tonight’s program through me.